My investigation is based around comparing two different
football magazines that are aimed at different-aged audiences, so I had to find
out how to find the most appropriate magazines to compare. The two magazines I
have eventually decided to compare are 'Four Four two' magazine, and 'Match'
magazine.
My main question for this research is: How do these two magazines use different language techniques to communicate to their different audiences?
I look to differentiate these through the language used, grammar, graphology, phonology?, use of humour, and initial front-cover presentation.
The theory it is based around is language and change.
There are several reasons I have decided to compare these two. Firstly, according to 'www.w3newspapers.com', they are both in the top 4 best-selling football magazines in the world - with Four Four two and match being the only two in the top four sold regularly in England.
My main question for this research is: How do these two magazines use different language techniques to communicate to their different audiences?
I look to differentiate these through the language used, grammar, graphology, phonology?, use of humour, and initial front-cover presentation.
The theory it is based around is language and change.
There are several reasons I have decided to compare these two. Firstly, according to 'www.w3newspapers.com', they are both in the top 4 best-selling football magazines in the world - with Four Four two and match being the only two in the top four sold regularly in England.
Also, they both (as intended) have very different target
audiences. Four Four Two is a more serious, informative magazine, said to be
aimed at ages 15-25 and at a middle classed audience who are more interested in
the facts and detailed information(Source: http://cf.blogetery.com). Whereas on
the other hand, match magazine has an average-reader age of 11 so therefore is
aimed at a fairly younger audience.(Source: http://www.bauermedia.co.uk)
However, there are also some good similarities between them
that make them even more suitable to compare, such as the fact that both of
these magazines were released within a couple of days of each other (with four
four two being a monthly magazine, and Match weekly) so they will contain the
same stories, but in their specific way. Also, both of these magazines are
aimed more at boys/men as normally you tend to see football as a male interest
so in this respect they may contain similar (male) language.
So overall the majority of what I do to compare them will be by finding similar stories in the two of these magazines, but seeing at how they present them differently and how they speak to their audience. As said above, I will also look at the language and grammar used, how much they use both graphology and possibly even phonology, the seriousness of the texts/use of humour and also I will compare their front covers to ultimately see how their magazine is meant to be seen.
So overall the majority of what I do to compare them will be by finding similar stories in the two of these magazines, but seeing at how they present them differently and how they speak to their audience. As said above, I will also look at the language and grammar used, how much they use both graphology and possibly even phonology, the seriousness of the texts/use of humour and also I will compare their front covers to ultimately see how their magazine is meant to be seen.